![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaWCWhPM0cSRF44qFkgy0pe1NDlEB30wbIe4XcWH4X1gDj15lqtB6oD2P6sLgORplrM8UDo-Pr0x6NVMDJjbtevOt31DbnHXbuNqakkgoudFeqWNi5stJswszAEwJsXDv9bjHWD2KcSkm9/s400/donate.jpg)
I am shocked - the Daily Mail is trying to take a high moral tone over MP's expense troughing, but wants its readers to cough up donations to a fund to prosecute the worst offenders if plod bottle it.
Surely if the Mail wants to mount a campaign it can use its own money?
I wonder if the Taxpayers' Alliance realised that donations were going to be asked for when they got involved?
The Penguin
2 comments:
Perhaps- however I believe that people have no way of channeling their anger- This must be only just one way of many ways to galvanise people to action
I don't agree Mr P. and I do agree Guthrum. This seems to be primarily a way to allow people to put their money where their mouths are rather than a funding exercise.
It then becomes more like The people v The porkers rather than Rich right wing paper v The porkers.
Post a Comment